First of all: Thank you for your time. Thanks for trying to help us making jDownloads a better component. It's very much appreciated!
================================================
THIS BUGTRACKER IS CLOSED!!!
THIS BUGTRACKER IS CLOSED!!!
THIS BUGTRACKER IS CLOSED!!!
================================================
So it is not possible to add new task here.
Please use the support forum when you will do this.
We hope we can go online with a new bugtracker site in the next weeks - we work on it.
Many thanks.
================================================
THIS BUGTRACKER IS CLOSED!!!
THIS BUGTRACKER IS CLOSED!!!
THIS BUGTRACKER IS CLOSED!!!
================================================
So it is not possible to add new task here.
Please use the support forum when you will do this.
We hope we can go online with a new bugtracker site in the next weeks - we work on it.
Many thanks.
FS#2 - Function to use cloud storage files with external providers
Attached to Project:
jDownloads
Opened by Anonymous Submitter - Tuesday, 02 November 2010, 22:27 GMT+2
Last edited by Administrator (admin) - Thursday, 25 November 2010, 23:53 GMT+2
Opened by Anonymous Submitter - Tuesday, 02 November 2010, 22:27 GMT+2
Last edited by Administrator (admin) - Thursday, 25 November 2010, 23:53 GMT+2
|
DetailsHi Arno!
I want to suggest a new idea that can be interesting for many people and I take advantage to test this flyspray. I think that an be powerfull that in Frontend, when a user uploads a file, can do this upload to a external website. This can be great to save much money with Hosting plans and increase website rendiment. For example: this can do with: S3 Amazon: http://aws.amazon.com/s3/ Megaupload Rapidshare My idea is that in backend, the webmaster can select the id and password for a hosting provider and users can know if files are hosted in this server or hosted in cloud storage service. It is posible? Many thanks! |
This task depends upon
Closed by Administrator (admin)
Thursday, 25 November 2010, 23:53 GMT+2
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Thursday, 25 November 2010, 23:53 GMT+2
Reason for closing: Won't implement
Perhaps in a later release. I have current not the time to check whether it is possible and how much work is it.